Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EtilEtil
VS
GPAGPA
Etil

Etil

Rua José Szakall, São Paulo, SP, 01140-120 , BR

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://etil.com.br/
769/1000Fair

Há mais de 30 anos atuando na indústria brasileira de energia, a Etil é uma distribuidora de materiais elétricos reconhecida no país por sua ampla experiência no setor e rígida política de qualidade. A empresa tem como diferencial o atendimento e desenvolvimento de proj...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:47
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GPA

GPA

Avenida Brigadeiro Luís Antônio 3172, São Paulo, 01402000, BR

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.gpabr.com
814/1000Good

We are one of the largest food retail companies in Brazil. We were pioneers with a multi-format and multi-channel business model that brings together renowned chains and brands such as Pão de Açúcar and Extra, Minuto Pão de Açúcar, Pão de Açúcar Fresh and Mini Extra. In...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:25,350
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Etil

Etil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GPA

GPA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Etil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GPA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Etil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Etil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Etil

Etil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GPA

GPA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Etil company and GPA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Etil company and GPA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Etil company and GPA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Etil company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Etil company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Etil company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Etil company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Etil company and GPA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Etil company and GPA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Etil company and GPA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Etil company and GPA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Etil and GPA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Etil and GPA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Etil or GPA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Etil or GPA ?
Between Etil and GPA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Etil and GPA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA