Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Etablissements Darty SAEtablissements Darty SA
VS
BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.ŞBİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş
Etablissements Darty SA

Etablissements Darty SA

1131, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.darty.ch
788/1000Fair

Since its inception, Darty - a specialist distributor - has designed and deployed a commercial philosophy aimed at providing high added value for customers. The Contract of Confidence (its written commitment to its customers) has been guaranteeing price, choice and serv...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:168
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

Abdurrahmangazi Mah.Ebubekir Cad. No:73 Sancaktepe, İstanbul, TR

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bim.com.tr
798/1000Fair

Türkiye’de perakende sektörünün lideri olan BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş., temel gıda ve tüketim malzemelerinin uygun fiyat ve yüksek kaliteyle tüketiciye ulaştırılması hedefiyle faaliyetlerine 1995 yılında 21 mağazayla başlamıştır. Yüksek indirim (hard-discount) modelini...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,526
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Etablissements Darty SA

Etablissements Darty SA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Etablissements Darty SA has 49.75% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Etablissements Darty SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Etablissements Darty SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Etablissements Darty SA

Etablissements Darty SA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ETA1770913459
BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Etablissements Darty SA company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Etablissements Darty SA or BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Etablissements Darty SA or BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Etablissements Darty SA and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9