Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Estithmar HoldingEstithmar Holding
VS
Koç HoldingKoç Holding
Estithmar Holding

Estithmar Holding

10th Floor, The eighteen tower, Building No. 230, Street 303, Zone 69, Lusail City, Qatar, QA

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

Estithmar Holding is a Qatari public listed company with a diverse portfolio of 51 companies operating in 4 strategic sectors. The company has a strong track record of growth and profitability, and is well-governed with a lean, optimized team that delivers quality in re...

NAICS:55
NAICS Definition:Management of Companies and Enterprises
Employees:391
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Koç Holding

Koç Holding

Nakkaştepe, Azizbey Sokak No: 1, Istanbul, 34674, TR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.koc.com.tr
785/1000Fair

Koç Holding is Turkey’s leading investment holding company and Koç Group is Turkey's largest industrial and services group in terms of revenues, exports, number of employees, taxes paid and market capitalization on Borsa Istanbul. Being the only Turkish company to be ra...

NAICS:55
NAICS Definition:Management of Companies and Enterprises
Employees:77,737
Subsidiaries:53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Estithmar Holding

Estithmar Holding

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Koç Holding

Koç Holding

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Holding Companies Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Estithmar Holding in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Holding Companies Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Koç Holding in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Estithmar Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Estithmar Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Koç Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Koç Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Estithmar Holding

Estithmar Holding

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Koç Holding

Koç Holding

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Estithmar Holding company and Koç Holding company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Estithmar Holding company and Koç Holding company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Estithmar Holding company and Koç Holding company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Estithmar Holding company and Koç Holding company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Estithmar Holding company and Koç Holding company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Estithmar Holding company and Koç Holding company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Estithmar Holding company and Koç Holding company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Estithmar Holding company and Koç Holding company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Estithmar Holding company and Koç Holding company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Estithmar Holding company and Koç Holding company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Estithmar Holding company and Koç Holding company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Estithmar Holding and Koç Holding, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Estithmar Holding and Koç Holding, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Estithmar Holding or Koç Holding ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Estithmar Holding or Koç Holding ?
Between Estithmar Holding and Koç Holding, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Estithmar Holding and Koç Holding, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9