Comparison Overview

EssilorLuxottica

VS

Kellogg Company

EssilorLuxottica

1-6, Rue Paul Cézanne, None, Paris, None, FR, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We are EssilorLuxottica, a global leader in the design, manufacture and distribution of ophthalmic lenses, frames and sunglasses. Formed in 2018 by the combination of Essilor and Luxottica, our Company combines two centuries of innovation and human endeavour to elevate vision care and the consumer experience around it. We are home to the most loved and widely-recognized vision care and eyewear brands in the world. Our proprietary eyewear brands include Ray-Ban, Oakley, Costa, Vogue Eyewear, Persol and Oliver Peoples, complemented by over 20 prestigious licensed brands. Our advanced lens technologies include Varilux, Crizal, Eyezen, Stellest and Transitions. We offer superior shopping and patient experiences with a network of 18,000 stores including world-class retail brands like Sunglass Hut, LensCrafters, Salmoiraghi & Viganò and GrandVision. Every day, EssilorLuxottica’s more than 190,000 employees in 150 countries work towards a common mission to help people see more and be more. In 2021, the Company’s milestones included a collaboration with Meta to launch Ray-Ban Stories smart glasses; the acquisition of GrandVision bringing 39,000 new employees into our family; expansion of our International Employee Shareholding community, and the launch of Eyes on the Planet, our strategic approach to sustainability.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 79,782
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Kellogg Company

One Kellogg Square, Battle Creek, Michigan, 49017, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849

At Kellanova, our vision is to be the world’s best performing snacks-led powerhouse, unleashing the full potential of our differentiated brands and our passionate people. Powered by our strategy to Differentiate, Drive & Deliver, we are a leading company in global snacking, international cereal and noodles, and North America frozen foods, with iconic, world-class brands and strong underlying growth momentum and profitability. Our purpose is to create better days and a place at the table for everyone through our trusted foods brands. As part of this purpose, we are committed to advancing sustainable & equitable access to food by creating Better Days for 4 billion people by the end of 2030.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 15,288
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/essilorluxottica.jpeg
EssilorLuxottica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kellogg-company.jpeg
Kellogg Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EssilorLuxottica
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kellogg Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EssilorLuxottica in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kellogg Company in 2025.

Incident History — EssilorLuxottica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EssilorLuxottica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kellogg Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kellogg Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/essilorluxottica.jpeg
EssilorLuxottica
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kellogg-company.jpeg
Kellogg Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EssilorLuxottica company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kellogg Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

EssilorLuxottica company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Kellogg Company company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kellogg Company company and EssilorLuxottica company have not reported any cyber incidents.

EssilorLuxottica company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Kellogg Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

EssilorLuxottica company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Kellogg Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

EssilorLuxottica company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Kellogg Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither EssilorLuxottica company nor Kellogg Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EssilorLuxottica nor Kellogg Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

EssilorLuxottica company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kellogg Company company.

EssilorLuxottica company employs more people globally than Kellogg Company company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither EssilorLuxottica nor Kellogg Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EssilorLuxottica nor Kellogg Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EssilorLuxottica nor Kellogg Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EssilorLuxottica nor Kellogg Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EssilorLuxottica nor Kellogg Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EssilorLuxottica nor Kellogg Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H