Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Essilor Vision Foundation - USAEssilor Vision Foundation - USA
VS
UCLA HealthUCLA Health
Essilor Vision Foundation - USA

Essilor Vision Foundation - USA

13515 N Stemmons Fwy, Dallas, US

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.evfusa.org
760/1000Fair

Essilor Vision Foundation is a public charity that empowers children to reach their full potential by giving them the ability to see clearly. The Issue Good vision is crucial for learning, yet 1 in 4 children have a vision problem that affects their ability to learn. ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:40
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UCLA Health

UCLA Health

757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90095

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://uclahealth.org
753/1000Fair

For more than half a century, UCLA Health has provided the best in healthcare and the latest in medical technology to the people of Los Angeles and throughout the world. Comprised of Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, UCLA Medical Center Santa Monica, Resnick Neuropsyc...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:17,947
Subsidiaries:50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Essilor Vision Foundation - USA

Essilor Vision Foundation - USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UCLA Health

UCLA Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Essilor Vision Foundation - USA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCLA Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Essilor Vision Foundation - USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Essilor Vision Foundation - USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UCLA Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCLA Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Essilor Vision Foundation - USA

Essilor Vision Foundation - USA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UCLA Health

UCLA Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UCL11139223
🔒 Incident : Breach
UCL14320422

FAQ

Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA company and UCLA Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA company and UCLA Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA company and UCLA Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA company and UCLA Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA company and UCLA Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA company and UCLA Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA company and UCLA Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA company and UCLA Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA company and UCLA Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA company and UCLA Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA company and UCLA Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA and UCLA Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA and UCLA Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Essilor Vision Foundation - USA or UCLA Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Essilor Vision Foundation - USA or UCLA Health ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA and UCLA Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Essilor Vision Foundation - USA and UCLA Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3