Comparison Overview
Esme Consumer

Esme Consumer
Esme Consumer, Gurugram, 122003, IN
Last Update: 15/03/2026
At Esme, we are committed to making highly innovative beauty and personal care products accessible and affordable to masses. Our journey began in 2019 when SAMARA CAPITAL (a PE fund with a portfolio of 20+ companies) acquired two small Delhi based FMCG companies - Blue...

O Boticário
Av. Rui Barbosa, 4.110, Parque das Fontes,, São José dos Pinhais, 83.050-010, BR
Last Update: 04/04/2026
A beleza transforma, encanta, conquista e também pode ser conquistada. Eis o ideal de beleza que O Boticário multiplica com seus produtos, lojas e em sua relação com o público. Desde 1977, O Boticário soma inspiração, ousadia, inovação e qualidade, despertando o respei...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Esme Consumer







O Boticário






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Esme Consumer in 2026.
Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for O Boticário in 2026.
Incident History - Esme Consumer (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Esme Consumer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - O Boticário (X = Date, Y = Severity)
O Boticário cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Esme Consumer

O Boticário
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.