Comparison Overview

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

VS

PT PLN (Persero)

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Maxwell Drive, Sunninghill , Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA, 2191
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Company profile Eskom Holdings generates, transports and distributes approximately 95% of South Africa’s electricity – making up 60% of the total electricity consumed on the African continent. Eskom is the world’s eleventh-largest power utility in terms of generating capacity, ranks ninth in terms of sales, and boasts the world's largest dry-cooling power station. Eskom Holdings’ Enterprises Division designs, builds and refurbishes Eskom’s assets, and acts as a catalyst for project development for the group. Eskom Enterprises’ main focus is to support Eskom Holdings and be the custodian of non-regulated businesses and offer strategic and commercial lifecycle services to the line divisions.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 41,778
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

PT PLN (Persero)

Jl. Trunojoyo Blok M I/135, Jakarta Selatan, Jakarta, 12160, ID
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Indonesia State Electricity Corporation PLN has a long history in electricity industry of Indonesia. As the sole provider of electricity in Indonesia, PLN is striving to increase quality of services to all Indonesian. In 1972, in accordance with Government Regulation No.17, the State-owned Electricity Company was enacted as a State-owned General Electricity Company and as PKUK responsible to provide electricity to meet public needs. While the Government policy was giving opportunity to the Private Sectors to focus on the provision of electricity, the status of PLN was changed from a General Company to Corporation’ as well as PKUK in providing electricity for public needs until the present. Throughout the 75 years of journey, PT PLN (Persero) has succeeded in becoming one of the companies with the largest assets in Indonesia of IDR 1,589 Trillion (PT PLN (Persero) Financial Report 2020 Audited).

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 22,729
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eskom.jpeg
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-pln-persero-.jpeg
PT PLN (Persero)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PT PLN (Persero)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT PLN (Persero) in 2025.

Incident History — Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PT PLN (Persero) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT PLN (Persero) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eskom.jpeg
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-pln-persero-.jpeg
PT PLN (Persero)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PT PLN (Persero) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PT PLN (Persero) company has not reported any.

In the current year, PT PLN (Persero) company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) company nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) company nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while PT PLN (Persero) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company nor PT PLN (Persero) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor PT PLN (Persero) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company nor PT PLN (Persero) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company employs more people globally than PT PLN (Persero) company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor PT PLN (Persero) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor PT PLN (Persero) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor PT PLN (Persero) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor PT PLN (Persero) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor PT PLN (Persero) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor PT PLN (Persero) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X