Comparison Overview

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

VS

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Maxwell Drive, Sunninghill , Johannesburg, 2191, ZA
Last Update: 2026-01-25

Company profile Eskom Holdings generates, transports and distributes approximately 95% of South Africa’s electricity – making up 60% of the total electricity consumed on the African continent. Eskom is the world’s eleventh-largest power utility in terms of generating capacity, ranks ninth in terms of sales, and boasts the world's largest dry-cooling power station. Eskom Holdings’ Enterprises Division designs, builds and refurbishes Eskom’s assets, and acts as a catalyst for project development for the group. Eskom Enterprises’ main focus is to support Eskom Holdings and be the custodian of non-regulated businesses and offer strategic and commercial lifecycle services to the line divisions.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 42,043
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

300 Lakeside Dr, Oakland, 94612, US
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 800 and 849

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, incorporated in California in 1905, is one of the largest combination natural gas and electric utilities in the United States. Based in San Francisco, the company is a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. There are approximately 20,000 employees who carry out Pacific Gas and Electric Company's primary business—the transmission and delivery of energy. The company provides natural gas and electric service to approximately 15 million people throughout a 70,000-square-mile service area in northern and central California. Fast Facts * Service area stretches from Eureka in the north to Bakersfield in the south, and from the Pacific Ocean in the west to the Sierra Nevada in the east * 141,215 circuit miles of electric distribution lines and 18,616 circuit miles of interconnected transmission lines * 42,141 miles of natural gas distribution pipelines and 6,438 miles of transportation pipelines * 5.1 million electric customer accounts * 4.3 million natural gas customer accounts

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 22,902
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eskom.jpeg
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacificgasandelectric.jpeg
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Gas and Electric Company in 2026.

Incident History — Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pacific Gas and Electric Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Gas and Electric Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eskom.jpeg
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacificgasandelectric.jpeg
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2016
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Database Exposure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Pacific Gas and Electric Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd and Pacific Gas and Electric Company have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Pacific Gas and Electric Company company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company company nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company company nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Pacific Gas and Electric Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company employs more people globally than Pacific Gas and Electric Company company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N