Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

East Sussex Healthcare NHS TrustEast Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
VS
American Medical ResponseAmerican Medical Response
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

East Sussex, GB

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.esht.nhs.uk
762/1000Fair

We provide safe, compassionate and high quality hospital and community care to over half a million people living in East Sussex and those who visit our local area. We are one of the largest organisations in East Sussex with an annual income of £650 million and we are t...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:1,895
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
American Medical Response

American Medical Response

6363 S. Fiddlers Green Circle, Greenwood Village, 80111, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amr.net
769/1000Fair

American Medical Response, America’s leading provider of medical transportation, has a single mission: making a difference by caring for people in need. AMR solutions include 911 emergency, interfacility transportation, event medical, advanced & basic life support trans...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:10,635
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
American Medical Response

American Medical Response

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Medical Response in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - American Medical Response (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Medical Response cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EAS193325422
American Medical Response

American Medical Response

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AME538072525

FAQ

Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust company and American Medical Response company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust company and American Medical Response company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust company and American Medical Response company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust company and American Medical Response company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust company and American Medical Response company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust and American Medical Response, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust and American Medical Response, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust or American Medical Response ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust or American Medical Response ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust and American Medical Response, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust and American Medical Response, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2