Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ESBESB
VS
FramatomeFramatome
ESB

ESB

27 Fitzwilliam Street Lower , Dublin 2, D02 KT92. , IE

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://esb.ie
765/1000Fair

At ESB, we believe in a Brighter Future... We believe that electricity is an enabler of societal and economic well-being and that every citizen should have access to secure, sustainable and affordable electricity supplies. Since our establishment in 1927, we have wo...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:4,874
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Framatome

Framatome

1 place Jean Millier, Courbevoie, FR, 92400

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.framatome.com
782/1000Fair

Framatome is an international leader in nuclear energy recognized for its innovative, digital and value added solutions for the global nuclear fleet. With worldwide expertise and a proven track record for reliability and performance, the company designs, services and in...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:13,683
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ESB

ESB

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Framatome

Framatome

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ESB in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Framatome in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ESB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ESB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Framatome (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Framatome cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ESB

ESB

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ESB0341122
Framatome

Framatome

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ESB company and Framatome company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ESB company and Framatome company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ESB company and Framatome company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ESB company and Framatome company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ESB company and Framatome company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ESB company and Framatome company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ESB company and Framatome company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ESB company and Framatome company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ESB company and Framatome company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ESB company and Framatome company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ESB company and Framatome company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ESB and Framatome, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ESB and Framatome, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ESB or Framatome ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ESB or Framatome ?
Between ESB and Framatome, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ESB and Framatome, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2