Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ESAB Cutting AutomationESAB Cutting Automation
VS
KonecranesKonecranes
ESAB Cutting Automation

ESAB Cutting Automation

N/A

Last Update: 04/12/2025

View Profile

The Power of One.

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Konecranes

Konecranes

P.O. Box 661, Koneenkatu 8, Hyvinkaa, FI, 05801

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.konecranes.com
770/1000Fair

Konecranes is a global leader in material handling solutions, serving a broad range of customers across multiple industries. We consistently set the industry benchmark, from everyday improvements to the breakthroughs at moments that matter most, because we know we can a...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:11,292
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ESAB Cutting Automation

ESAB Cutting Automation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Konecranes

Konecranes

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ESAB Cutting Automation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Konecranes in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ESAB Cutting Automation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ESAB Cutting Automation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Konecranes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Konecranes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ESAB Cutting Automation

ESAB Cutting Automation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Konecranes

Konecranes

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ESAB Cutting Automation company and Konecranes company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation company and Konecranes company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation company and Konecranes company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation company and Konecranes company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation company and Konecranes company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation and Konecranes, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation and Konecranes, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ESAB Cutting Automation or Konecranes ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ESAB Cutting Automation or Konecranes ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation and Konecranes, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ESAB Cutting Automation and Konecranes, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3