Comparison Overview
ESA Clean Space
ESA Clean Space
ESA HEADQUARTERS, Paris Cedex 15, 75738, FR
Last Update: 10/03/2026
Clean Space aims to ensure a sustainable space industry for the terrestrial and space environments, by redefining how the space industry operates, increasing the competitiveness of European industry.
General Dynamics
11011 Sunset Hills Rd, Reston, 20190, US
Last Update: 14/09/2026
From Gulfstream business jets and combat vehicles to nuclear-powered submarines and communications systems, people around the world depend on our products and services for their safety and security. General Dynamics is headquartered in Reston, Virginia, and employs ove...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
ESA Clean Space
General Dynamics
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ESA Clean Space in 2026.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
General Dynamics has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - ESA Clean Space (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ESA Clean Space cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - General Dynamics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
General Dynamics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
ESA Clean Space
General Dynamics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.