Comparison Overview

Ethnic and Racial Studies

VS

Cambridge Law Review

Ethnic and Racial Studies

University of Surrey, None, Guildford, None, GB, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Ethnic and Racial Studies is the leading international journal for the analysis of the role of race, racism, ethnicity, migration and forms of ethno-nationalism. These social phenomena are at the heart of many of the major social and political issues in the modern world. As the leading journal in these areas we seek to provide an interdisciplinary academic forum for the presentation of original research and theoretical analysis, drawing particularly on sociology, social policy, anthropology, political science, international relations, geography, history, social psychology and cultural studies.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cambridge Law Review

10 West Road, Cambridge, England, GB, CB3 9DZ
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Cambridge Law Review is a student-run law journal serving as an academic forum for contemporary and cutting-edge legal issues. The journal welcomes contributions from around the world, and acts as a research springboard and tool for academics, lawyers, and students of law alike. Co Editors-in-Chief for Volume 11 (2025-26): Kaden Pradhan and Thomas Loke Zhih Hahn; Editor-in-Chief for Volumes 9 (2023-24) and 10 (2024-25): Wednesday Eden

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ersjournal.jpeg
Ethnic and Racial Studies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-law-review.jpeg
Cambridge Law Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ethnic and Racial Studies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cambridge Law Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ethnic and Racial Studies in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cambridge Law Review in 2025.

Incident History — Ethnic and Racial Studies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ethnic and Racial Studies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cambridge Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cambridge Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ersjournal.jpeg
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-law-review.jpeg
Cambridge Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Ethnic and Racial Studies company and Cambridge Law Review company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Cambridge Law Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ethnic and Racial Studies company.

In the current year, Cambridge Law Review company and Ethnic and Racial Studies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cambridge Law Review company nor Ethnic and Racial Studies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cambridge Law Review company nor Ethnic and Racial Studies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cambridge Law Review company nor Ethnic and Racial Studies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ethnic and Racial Studies company nor Cambridge Law Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ethnic and Racial Studies nor Cambridge Law Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ethnic and Racial Studies company nor Cambridge Law Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cambridge Law Review company employs more people globally than Ethnic and Racial Studies company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Ethnic and Racial Studies nor Cambridge Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ethnic and Racial Studies nor Cambridge Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ethnic and Racial Studies nor Cambridge Law Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ethnic and Racial Studies nor Cambridge Law Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ethnic and Racial Studies nor Cambridge Law Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ethnic and Racial Studies nor Cambridge Law Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.