Comparison Overview
EY

EY
6 More London Place, London, SE1 2DA, GB
Last Update: 29/07/2026
EY is building a better working world by creating new value for clients, people, society, the planet, while building trust in the capital markets. Enabled by data, AI and advanced technology, EY teams help clients shape the future with confidence and develop answers fo...

Allied Universal
450 Exchange, Irvine, 92602, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Allied Universal®, a leading security and facility services company, provides proactive security services and cutting-edge smart technology to deliver evolving, tailored solutions that allow clients to focus on their core business. Our excellence starts with our local l...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

EY







Allied Universal






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)
EY has 100.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Allied Universal in 2026.
Incident History - EY (X = Date, Y = Severity)
EY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Allied Universal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Allied Universal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

EY

Allied Universal
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.