Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ernst & Young Global Consulting ServicesErnst & Young Global Consulting Services
VS
Stefanini BrasilStefanini Brasil
Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services

Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services

One Montague Place, Nassau, P.O. Box N-3231, BS

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ey.com
731/1000Moderate

At EY, our purpose is Building a better working world. The insights and quality services we provide help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our s...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:5,650
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Stefanini Brasil

Stefanini Brasil

Avenida Eusébio Matoso 1375, São Paulo, 05423-905, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stefanini.com.br
790/1000Fair

Global Tech Consulting Company All in One. Stefanini is a Brazilian multinational company with 37 years of experience and presence in 41 countries. With more than 38,000 employees, we co-create solutions for a better future, driving digital transformation with a focu...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:12,159
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services

Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stefanini Brasil

Stefanini Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stefanini Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stefanini Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stefanini Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services

Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ERN0092100103025
Stefanini Brasil

Stefanini Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services and Stefanini Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services and Stefanini Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services or Stefanini Brasil ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services or Stefanini Brasil ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services and Stefanini Brasil, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ernst & Young Global Consulting Services and Stefanini Brasil, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA