Comparison Overview
Ericsson
Ericsson
Torshamnsgatan 21, Kista, Stockholm, SE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The future of mobile isn’t on the horizon, it’s happening now. At Ericsson, we’re building the foundation for an open network ecosystem where industries, developers, and enterprises thrive. The convergence of 5G, AI, cloud, and network APIs isn’t just a technological s...
SFR
16, Rue du Général Alain de Boissieu, Paris, 75015, FR
Last Update: 20/09/2026
SFR is the number one alternative telecoms operator in France. SFR is also an operator providing a comprehensive range of services meeting the expectations of private and business customers alike, offering them the best of the digital world. At year-end 2011, the total ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Ericsson
SFR
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
Ericsson has 58.73% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
SFR has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Ericsson (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ericsson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SFR (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SFR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Ericsson
SFR
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.
Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.
Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.
Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.
Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/blob/19b5b74faa78d0816b8d4d4c7d7543fc3520678c/vibe/core/git/repo.py#L411-L431
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/commit/c069ffa1e12fb5f2487b489217c40ab97721d553
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/issues/996
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/releases/tag/v2.25.5
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/mistral-vibe-before-2.25.5-remote-code-execution-via-git-post-checkout