Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)
VS
LTIMindtreeLTIMindtree
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

N/A

Last Update: 07/01/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스는 2010년 7월 1일 에릭슨과 LG전자가 설립한 합작회사입니다. 국내 통신사 및 기업과 긴밀한 협력을 통해 글로벌 기술과 경험을 바탕으로 앞선 기술력과 솔루션을 제공합니다. 서울 R&D 센터에는 ICT 기술력과 에릭슨 혁신 문화 에 정통한 약 500명의 개발 전문가가 있습니다. 5G RAN, 5G Core, Cloud-native, Beyond 5G, 6G 관 련 첨단 기술 개발에 주력하고 있습니다. 또한 고객 과 소통하는 R&D로 국내 통신사와 협업을 ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LTIMindtree

LTIMindtree

L&T Infotech, Technology Tower. Gate No. 5, Saki Vihar Road, Powai, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400072, IN, Mumbai, MH, IN, 400072

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ltimindtree.com
786/1000Fair

LTIMindtree is a global technology consulting and digital solutions company that partners with enterprises across industries to reimagine business models, accelerate innovation, and drive AI-centric growth. Trusted by more than 700 clients worldwide, we use advanced tec...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:114,189
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LTIMindtree

LTIMindtree

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LTIMindtree in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LTIMindtree (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LTIMindtree cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LTIMindtree

LTIMindtree

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and LTIMindtree company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and LTIMindtree company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and LTIMindtree company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and LTIMindtree company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and LTIMindtree company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and LTIMindtree, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and LTIMindtree, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) or LTIMindtree ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) or LTIMindtree ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and LTIMindtree, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and LTIMindtree, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56082
SUMMARY

Capgo (Cap-go/capgo) before 12.128.2 contains an improper access control vulnerability in the SECURITY DEFINER PostgREST RPC function public.record_build_time, which is granted to the anon role and callable with only the public Supabase publishable (sb_publishable_*) anon key. An unauthenticated attacker can insert rows into public.build_logs for arbitrary organizations and, because the function uses ON CONFLICT (build_id, org_id) DO UPDATE, can overwrite existing usage/billing records by reusing the same build_id for a target org. This enables cross-tenant tampering of billing build logs and financial-impact denial of service by inflating billable build time.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56081
SUMMARY

Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authentication logic flaw that lets an attacker register and control an account bound to a victim's email address before that email is verified. By enabling two-factor authentication on the pre-registered account, the attacker gains control over the account claimed under the victim's identity, allowing them to read and modify its state and enforce organization-level policies, while the legitimate user is denied access to the account tied to their own email.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56080
SUMMARY

Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a flaw in the Enforce Password Policy feature: after a Super Admin enables the policy and successfully changes their password to a compliant one, the backend does not update the password-compliance state. As a result, the backend continues to treat the account as non-compliant and repeatedly forces password-reset prompts, permanently locking the Super Admin out of organization access (organization lockout / denial of service) despite valid authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-56079
SUMMARY

Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a cross-tenant authorization bypass vulnerability in PostgREST endpoints that allows org-scoped read API keys to access other tenants' webhook secrets and delivery logs. Attackers can query the webhooks and webhook_deliveries endpoints to exfiltrate HMAC signing secrets and delivery payloads, enabling forged webhook events against victim organizations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56073
SUMMARY

Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in OTP verification that allows attackers to bypass email verification by modifying server responses. Attackers can intercept OTP verification requests and manipulate HTTP responses to falsely mark verification successful, enabling unauthorized 2FA enablement and account takeover.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9