Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)
VS
IBMIBM
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

N/A

Last Update: 07/01/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스는 2010년 7월 1일 에릭슨과 LG전자가 설립한 합작회사입니다. 국내 통신사 및 기업과 긴밀한 협력을 통해 글로벌 기술과 경험을 바탕으로 앞선 기술력과 솔루션을 제공합니다. 서울 R&D 센터에는 ICT 기술력과 에릭슨 혁신 문화 에 정통한 약 500명의 개발 전문가가 있습니다. 5G RAN, 5G Core, Cloud-native, Beyond 5G, 6G 관 련 첨단 기술 개발에 주력하고 있습니다. 또한 고객 과 소통하는 R&D로 국내 통신사와 협업을 ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IBM

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US

Last Update: 04/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.ibm.com
403/1000Critical

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and co...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:336,062
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
9
Known data breaches
14
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IBM

IBM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

IBM has 773.79% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IBM

IBM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
IBM1785746071
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1785357547
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1785321873

FAQ

Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and IBM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and IBM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and IBM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and IBM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and IBM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) or IBM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) or IBM ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and IBM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and IBM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-45537
SUMMARY

OpenSIPS is a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) server implementation. In versions prior to 3.6.6 and 4.0.0-rc1, the construct_uri() function concatenates multiple URI components (protocol, username, domain, port, params) into a fixed 1024-byte global BSS buffer without any bounds checking. When a routing script calls construct_uri() with an attacker-controlled username, a combined component length exceeding 1024 bytes overflows the buffer, corrupting adjacent global data with attacker-controlled content. The overflow reaches disable_503_translation, a global flag controlling SIP 503 response handling, allowing an attacker to deterministically set the flag via the URI username and alter the server's routing behavior for subsequent messages. Because the same buffer is shared with contact_builder(), the overflow also corrupts that function's data, and without a memory sanitizer the adjacent globals are silently overwritten on every request containing a long username. This issue has been fixed in versions 3.6.6 and 4.0.0-rc1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-04
UPDATED
Date2026-08-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-18819
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in RackTables up to 0.22.0/e5fff9f8aab339798ed47e8c6d7d977ed97a82bd. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project maintainer confirms: "[I]t seems plausible, in that RackTables does not at this time have any CSRF prevention. You may assign a CVE ID to this, but there is no guarantee it will be handled in urgent, or even timely, manner, or at all."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-04
UPDATED
Date2026-08-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-18818
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Ehco1996 django-sspanel up to 2023.12.26. This affects the function TicketDetailView of the file apps/sspanel/views.py of the component Support Ticket Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-04
UPDATED
Date2026-08-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-70620
SUMMARY

Odysseus before commit 87babb5 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows admin-privileged attackers to direct the server to probe internal network resources by supplying arbitrary URLs to the embedding endpoint configuration without scheme, host, IP range, or DNS rebind validation. Attackers can submit loopback addresses, RFC 1918 ranges, or link-local addresses through the embedding endpoint API to partially read responses from cloud instance metadata services, internal APIs, and other hosts reachable from the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-04
UPDATED
Date2026-08-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-70619
SUMMARY

Odysseus before commit bf325f6 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated non-admin users to manage server-wide embedding backend configuration by invoking endpoint management routes that verify session authentication but omit the admin authorization guard. Attackers can supply an attacker-controlled URL to overwrite the embedding backend persisted in the endpoint configuration file and process environment, causing all subsequent embedding operations including chat messages, RAG queries, memory entries, and vault text to be transmitted in plaintext to the attacker-controlled destination, or delete the endpoint configuration to deny embedding service to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-04
UPDATED
Date2026-08-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8