Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)
VS
HGSHGS
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

N/A

Last Update: 07/01/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스는 2010년 7월 1일 에릭슨과 LG전자가 설립한 합작회사입니다. 국내 통신사 및 기업과 긴밀한 협력을 통해 글로벌 기술과 경험을 바탕으로 앞선 기술력과 솔루션을 제공합니다. 서울 R&D 센터에는 ICT 기술력과 에릭슨 혁신 문화 에 정통한 약 500명의 개발 전문가가 있습니다. 5G RAN, 5G Core, Cloud-native, Beyond 5G, 6G 관 련 첨단 기술 개발에 주력하고 있습니다. 또한 고객 과 소통하는 R&D로 국내 통신사와 협업을 ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HGS

HGS

HGS USA Corporate Headquarters , Chicago, IL , US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://hgs.cx/
748/1000Moderate

A global leader in optimizing the customer experience lifecycle, digital transformation, and business process management, HGS is helping its clients become more competitive every day. HGS combines automation, analytics, and artificial intelligence with deep domain exper...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:28,465
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HGS

HGS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HGS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HGS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HGS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HGS

HGS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and HGS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and HGS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and HGS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and HGS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and HGS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and HGS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and HGS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and HGS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and HGS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and HGS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and HGS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and HGS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and HGS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) or HGS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) or HGS ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and HGS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and HGS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16197
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. The affected element is the function handleMessageReceive of the file pkg/channels/feishu/feishu_64.go of the component Group Message Handler. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-16196
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. Impacted is the function isPrivateOrRestrictedIP of the file pkg/tools/integration/web.go of the component web_fetch. This manipulation causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Patch name: 2efbe5d560e7ed9bc5209c203dc4aa6ecdbc7405. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-16195
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. This issue affects the function dispatchIncoming of the file pkg/channels/wecom/wecom.go of the component Group Message Handler. The manipulation results in incorrect authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-10130
SUMMARY

QueryWeaver contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain valid session tokens for existing accounts by submitting a signup request with a known victim email address. The signup route unconditionally creates and links a new token to the matching Identity via a Cypher MERGE operation before checking whether the email belongs to an existing account, causing the server to return a valid authenticated session token for the victim's identity without requiring any prior credentials or user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-16194
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.1.1. This affects the function WebFetch.execute of the file agent/tools/web_fetch/web_fetch.py. Executing a manipulation of the argument url can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 2.1.2 is able to mitigate this issue. This patch is called ea47f3097eed4f8295c4cb3d76ecb97e0f43d632. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8