Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)
VS
CDWCDW
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

N/A

Last Update: 07/01/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스는 2010년 7월 1일 에릭슨과 LG전자가 설립한 합작회사입니다. 국내 통신사 및 기업과 긴밀한 협력을 통해 글로벌 기술과 경험을 바탕으로 앞선 기술력과 솔루션을 제공합니다. 서울 R&D 센터에는 ICT 기술력과 에릭슨 혁신 문화 에 정통한 약 500명의 개발 전문가가 있습니다. 5G RAN, 5G Core, Cloud-native, Beyond 5G, 6G 관 련 첨단 기술 개발에 주력하고 있습니다. 또한 고객 과 소통하는 R&D로 국내 통신사와 협업을 ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CDW

CDW

200 N. Milwaukee Ave., Vernon Hills, 60061, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cdw.com
788/1000Fair

At CDW, we know how to make technology work so people can do great things. Our experts bring a full-stack, full-lifestyle approach with custom solutions, services and relationships to bring your vision to life. Through decades of experience, scale, and deep industry e...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:18,115
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CDW

CDW

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDW in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CDW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CDW

CDW

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and CDW company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and CDW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and CDW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and CDW company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and CDW company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and CDW company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and CDW company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and CDW company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and CDW company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and CDW company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) company and CDW company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and CDW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and CDW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) or CDW ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) or CDW ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and CDW, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 에릭슨 코리아 파트너스 (Ericsson Korea Partners) and CDW, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA