Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Erasmus MC Kanker InstituutErasmus MC Kanker Instituut
VS
Johnson & JohnsonJohnson & Johnson
Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

Dr. Molewaterplein, Rotterdam, 3015, NL

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile

Wij zijn het Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut. Geworteld in Rotterdam, wereldstad en thuishaven. Het meest vooruitstrevende universitair medisch centrum van Nederland. Elke dag werken medewerkers, vrijwilligers en studenten met toewijding en passie aan alles waar het Erasmus...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson

New Brunswick, NJ, US, 08903

Last Update: 28/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jnj.com
778/1000Fair

At Johnson & Johnson, we believe health is everything. Our strength in healthcare innovation empowers us to build a world where complex diseases are prevented, treated, and cured, where treatments are smarter and less invasive, and solutions are personal. Through our ex...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:118,425
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Johnson & Johnson has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Johnson & Johnson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ERIDEFJOHROLVID1772180734
🔒 Incident : Breach
JOHROLERI1772202424
🔒 Incident : Breach
JOH333071125

FAQ

Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and Johnson & Johnson company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and Johnson & Johnson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and Johnson & Johnson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and Johnson & Johnson company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and Johnson & Johnson company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and Johnson & Johnson company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and Johnson & Johnson company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and Johnson & Johnson company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and Johnson & Johnson company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and Johnson & Johnson company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and Johnson & Johnson company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut and Johnson & Johnson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut and Johnson & Johnson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut or Johnson & Johnson ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut or Johnson & Johnson ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut and Johnson & Johnson, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut and Johnson & Johnson, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9