Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Erasmus MC Kanker InstituutErasmus MC Kanker Instituut
VS
AdventHealthAdventHealth
Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

Dr. Molewaterplein, Rotterdam, 3015, NL

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile

Wij zijn het Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut. Geworteld in Rotterdam, wereldstad en thuishaven. Het meest vooruitstrevende universitair medisch centrum van Nederland. Elke dag werken medewerkers, vrijwilligers en studenten met toewijding en passie aan alles waar het Erasmus...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AdventHealth

AdventHealth

900 Hope Way, Altamonte Springs, 32714, US

Last Update: 08/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://JoinAdventHealth.com
747/1000Moderate

AdventHealth is a connected network of care that helps people feel whole – body, mind and spirit. More than 100,000 team members across a national footprint provide whole-person care to nearly nine million people annually through more than 2,000 care sites that include ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:39,099
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AdventHealth

AdventHealth

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

AdventHealth has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AdventHealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AdventHealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AdventHealth

AdventHealth

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
XSOHONADVMAY1780958028

FAQ

Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and AdventHealth company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and AdventHealth company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and AdventHealth company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and AdventHealth company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut company and AdventHealth company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut and AdventHealth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut and AdventHealth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut or AdventHealth ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut or AdventHealth ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut and AdventHealth, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut and AdventHealth, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2