Comparison Overview

Equitas Small Finance Bank

VS

Bancolombia

Equitas Small Finance Bank

Spencer Plaza 4th floor , Phase II , no .769, Anna Salai, Chennai, Tamilnadu, IN, 600002
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Equitas Small Finance Bank is an active member of the communities where we live and work, and a strong philanthropic partner enabling individuals, families, businesses, and entire communities in their financial aspirations with seamless banking services. We take the responsibility to be good neighbours, and are committed to our legacy of giving back to our communities. We aim at changing the way banking is imagined delivered and experienced – with Fairness & Transparency being the key drivers.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 12,622
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bancolombia

CARRERA 48 26 85 AV INDUSTRIALES, Medellín, Antioquia, CO
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Somos un grupo financiero latinoamericano que apoya los sueños de las personas y busca establecer con ellas relaciones duraderas, basadas en la confianza, la cercanía, el respeto, la inclusión y la calidez. Escuchar, pensar en el otro y ser sensible a sus necesidades, nos ha llevado hacia una manera diferente de relacionarnos en la que todos somos importantes, porque no es lo mismo prestar servicios financieros que apoyar la construcción de proyectos de vida. Continuamos avanzando en nuestro proceso de transformación. La meta es ser más para servir mejor a través de soluciones ágiles, simples e impecables. Para lograrlo, le estamos poniendo el alma.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 20,196
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/equitas-small-finance-bank.jpeg
Equitas Small Finance Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bancolombia.jpeg
Bancolombia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Equitas Small Finance Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bancolombia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Equitas Small Finance Bank in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bancolombia in 2025.

Incident History — Equitas Small Finance Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Equitas Small Finance Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bancolombia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bancolombia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/equitas-small-finance-bank.jpeg
Equitas Small Finance Bank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bancolombia.jpeg
Bancolombia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bancolombia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Equitas Small Finance Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bancolombia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Equitas Small Finance Bank company.

In the current year, Bancolombia company and Equitas Small Finance Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bancolombia company nor Equitas Small Finance Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bancolombia company nor Equitas Small Finance Bank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bancolombia company nor Equitas Small Finance Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Equitas Small Finance Bank company nor Bancolombia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Equitas Small Finance Bank nor Bancolombia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bancolombia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Equitas Small Finance Bank company.

Bancolombia company employs more people globally than Equitas Small Finance Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Equitas Small Finance Bank nor Bancolombia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Equitas Small Finance Bank nor Bancolombia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Equitas Small Finance Bank nor Bancolombia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Equitas Small Finance Bank nor Bancolombia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Equitas Small Finance Bank nor Bancolombia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Equitas Small Finance Bank nor Bancolombia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H