Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EqualizeRCMEqualizeRCM
VS
Johnson & Johnson MedTechJohnson & Johnson MedTech
EqualizeRCM

EqualizeRCM

945 E Paces Ferry Rd NE, Suite 2100, Atlanta, GA, US, 30326

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.mrgllc.net
721/1000Moderate

Management Resource Group, LLC (MRG) understands how complicated and expensive the business side of patient care has become. Our firm, established in Mississippi in 1998, was created to provide medical practice management, billing and information technology (IT) service...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:36
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

1 Johnson and Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, New Jersey, US, 08901

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
811/1000Good

At Johnson & Johnson MedTech, we are working to solve the world’s most pressing healthcare challenges through innovations at the intersection of biology and technology. With deep expertise in surgery, orthopaedics, cardiovascular, and vision, we design healthcare soluti...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:36,750
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EqualizeRCM

EqualizeRCM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EqualizeRCM in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson MedTech in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - EqualizeRCM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EqualizeRCM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Johnson & Johnson MedTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson MedTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EqualizeRCM

EqualizeRCM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MRG624072525
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between EqualizeRCM company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EqualizeRCM company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EqualizeRCM company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EqualizeRCM company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EqualizeRCM company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EqualizeRCM company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EqualizeRCM company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EqualizeRCM company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EqualizeRCM company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EqualizeRCM company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EqualizeRCM company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EqualizeRCM and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EqualizeRCM and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EqualizeRCM or Johnson & Johnson MedTech ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EqualizeRCM or Johnson & Johnson MedTech ?
Between EqualizeRCM and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EqualizeRCM and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9