Comparison Overview
Epic Games Fortnite

Epic Games Fortnite
N/A
Last Update: 09/03/2026
Founded in 1991, Epic Games is a leading interactive entertainment company and provider of 3D engine technology. Epic operates Fortnite, one of the world’s largest games with over 350 million accounts and 2.5 billion friend connections. Epic also develops Unreal Engine,...

Ubisoft
2, Avenue Pasteur, Saint-Mandé, Île-de-France, FR, 94160
Last Update: 07/06/2026
Ubisoft is a global leader in gaming with teams across the world crafting original and memorable gaming experiences featuring brands such as Assassin’s Creed®, Brawlhalla®, For Honor®, Far Cry®, Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon®, Just Dance®, Rabbids®, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six®...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Epic Games Fortnite







Ubisoft






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Epic Games Fortnite in 2026.
Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ubisoft in 2026.
Incident History - Epic Games Fortnite (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Epic Games Fortnite cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ubisoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ubisoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Epic Games Fortnite

Ubisoft
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.