Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EPFL TTO Technology Transfer OfficeEPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office
VS
Virginia TechVirginia Tech
EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

EPFL - Innovation Park J, Lausanne, Vaud, CH

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://tto.epfl.ch/
773/1000Fair

We work with EPFL researchers to turn their technologies into business opportunities that can benefit society – in particular by capturing and licensing EPFL’s intellectual property assets, managing collaborations with industry, and by accelerating the commercialization...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Virginia Tech

Virginia Tech

800 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, 24061, US

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vt.edu
770/1000Fair

Dedicated to its motto, Ut Prosim (That I May Serve), Virginia Tech takes a hands-on, engaging approach to education, preparing scholars to be leaders in their fields and communities. As the commonwealth’s most comprehensive university and its leading research instituti...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:15,651
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Virginia Tech

Virginia Tech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Virginia Tech has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Virginia Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virginia Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Virginia Tech

Virginia Tech

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CANVIR1778280319

FAQ

Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and Virginia Tech company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and Virginia Tech company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and Virginia Tech company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and Virginia Tech company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and Virginia Tech company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office and Virginia Tech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office and Virginia Tech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office or Virginia Tech ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office or Virginia Tech ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office and Virginia Tech, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office and Virginia Tech, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-86098
SUMMARY

ntop nDPI versions before 6.0 contain a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the ndpi_json_string_escape function that writes beyond caller-supplied buffer boundaries. Attackers can trigger the overflow by supplying crafted network packet data including TLS SNI, HTTP headers, or DNS names that reach the vulnerable function, causing heap corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-86097
SUMMARY

PX4 Autopilot through 1.17.0 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in param_set_default_file() and param_set_backup_file() functions that allows attackers to crash the autopilot process. Attackers can invoke 'param select' or 'param select-backup' commands with no path argument from any PX4 shell to trigger the crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86096
SUMMARY

PX4 Autopilot through 1.17.0 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in TemperatureCalibration::start() due to a race condition between task spawning and object deletion. Attackers can trigger the calibration process via shell commands to write to freed heap memory, corrupting unrelated objects or allocator metadata and destabilizing heap operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86095
SUMMARY

Unidata netcdf-c through 4.10.1 contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in NC4_HDF5_inq_attname() that copies HDF5 attribute names into a fixed 256-byte buffer without length validation. Attackers can craft HDF5 files with oversized attribute names to overflow the destination buffer, causing memory corruption and crashes when applications enumerate attribute names.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-48019
SUMMARY

Laravel is a web application framework. Prior to versions 12.60.0 and 13.10.0, a CRLF injection vulnerability in Laravel's email validation, in combination with how Symfony Mailer and Symfony Mime handle certain character sequences, may allow an unauthenticated attacker to interfere with outbound email processing in applications that send mail to user-supplied addresses. This issue has been patched in versions 12.60.0 and 13.10.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2