Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EPFL TTO Technology Transfer OfficeEPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office
VS
University of CincinnatiUniversity of Cincinnati
EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

EPFL - Innovation Park J, Lausanne, Vaud, CH

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://tto.epfl.ch/
773/1000Fair

We work with EPFL researchers to turn their technologies into business opportunities that can benefit society – in particular by capturing and licensing EPFL’s intellectual property assets, managing collaborations with industry, and by accelerating the commercialization...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Cincinnati

University of Cincinnati

2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio, US, 45221-0063

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.uc.edu
801/1000Good

The University of Cincinnati, top 5 university for co-op and internships, offers students a balance of academic excellence and real-world experience. Since its founding in 1819, UC has been the source of many discoveries creating positive change for society, including t...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:16,718
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Cincinnati

University of Cincinnati

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Cincinnati in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Cincinnati (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Cincinnati cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Cincinnati

University of Cincinnati

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and University of Cincinnati company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and University of Cincinnati company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and University of Cincinnati company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and University of Cincinnati company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and University of Cincinnati company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and University of Cincinnati company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and University of Cincinnati company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and University of Cincinnati company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and University of Cincinnati company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and University of Cincinnati company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office company and University of Cincinnati company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office and University of Cincinnati, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office and University of Cincinnati, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office or University of Cincinnati ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office or University of Cincinnati ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office and University of Cincinnati, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EPFL TTO Technology Transfer Office and University of Cincinnati, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2