Comparison Overview
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems
41 University Drive Suite 202, Newtown, PA, US, 18940
Last Update: 07/09/2026
Since 1993, EPAM Systems, Inc. (NYSE: EPAM) has used its software engineering expertise to become a leading global provider of digital engineering, cloud and AI-enabled transformation services, and a leading business and experience consulting partner for global enterpri...
Persistent Systems
Bhageerath, 402 E, Senapati Bapat Road, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411016
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We are an AI-led, platform-driven Digital Engineering and Enterprise Modernization partner, combining deep technical expertise and industry experience to help our clients anticipate what’s next. Our offerings and proven solutions create a unique competitive advantage fo...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
EPAM Systems
Persistent Systems
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for EPAM Systems in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Persistent Systems in 2026.
Incident History - EPAM Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
EPAM Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Persistent Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Persistent Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
EPAM Systems
Persistent Systems
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.