Comparison Overview
EPAM Systems

EPAM Systems
41 University Drive Suite 202, Newtown, PA, US, 18940
Last Update: 07/09/2026
Since 1993, EPAM Systems, Inc. (NYSE: EPAM) has used its software engineering expertise to become a leading global provider of digital engineering, cloud and AI-enabled transformation services, and a leading business and experience consulting partner for global enterpri...

General Dynamics Information Technology
Falls Church, Virginia, US, 22042
Last Update: 13/09/2026
GDIT is a global technology and professional services company that delivers solutions, technology and mission services to every major agency across the U.S. government, defense and intelligence community. Our 30,000 experts extract the power of technology to create imm...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

EPAM Systems







General Dynamics Information Technology






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for EPAM Systems in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for General Dynamics Information Technology in 2026.
Incident History - EPAM Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
EPAM Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - General Dynamics Information Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
General Dynamics Information Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

EPAM Systems

General Dynamics Information Technology
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.