Comparison Overview
Swiss Federal Office of Personnel FOPER

Swiss Federal Office of Personnel FOPER
Eigerstrasse 71, Bern, undefined, 3007, CH
Last Update: 04/12/2025
Staff, our job. Every day, around 38,000 employees work for the enterprise that is Switzerland. How do we find the best people for the most diverse tasks? What instruments do the departments and federal offices need for personnel management? Which modern forms of work ...

The Adecco Group
Bellerivestrasse 30, Zurich, 8008, CH
Last Update: 07/09/2026
The Adecco Group is a world leading talent company. Our purpose is making the future work for everyone. Through our three global business units - Adecco, Akkodis and LHH - across 60 countries, we enable sustainable and lifelong employability for individuals, deliver dig...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Swiss Federal Office of Personnel FOPER







The Adecco Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Swiss Federal Office of Personnel FOPER in 2026.
Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Adecco Group in 2026.
Incident History - Swiss Federal Office of Personnel FOPER (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Swiss Federal Office of Personnel FOPER cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - The Adecco Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The Adecco Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Swiss Federal Office of Personnel FOPER

The Adecco Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.