Comparison Overview
Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals
Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals
3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, US
Last Update: 27/02/2026
This systems-centric program keeps engineers and scientists engaged in and on the leading edge of all aspects of analysis, design, integration, production, and operation of modern systems. Learn from instructors who are leading practitioners in the field of systems engi...
National University of Singapore
21 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, Singapore, 119077, SG
Last Update: 30/03/2026
At NUS, we are shaping the future through our people and our pursuit of new frontiers in knowledge. In a single century, we have become a university of global influence and an Asian thought leader. Our location at the crossroads of Asia informs our mission and gives us ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals
National University of Singapore
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
National University of Singapore has 8.26% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - National University of Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)
National University of Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals
National University of Singapore
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.
LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.
When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.
Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.
alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.