Comparison Overview
Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals
Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals
3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, US
Last Update: 27/02/2026
This systems-centric program keeps engineers and scientists engaged in and on the leading edge of all aspects of analysis, design, integration, production, and operation of modern systems. Learn from instructors who are leading practitioners in the field of systems engi...
The George Washington University
2121 I Street, NW, Washington, D.C., US, 20052
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The George Washington University, an independent academic institution chartered by the Congress of the United States in 1821, dedicates itself to furthering human well-being. The University values a dynamic, student-focused community stimulated by cultural and intellect...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals
The George Washington University
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The George Washington University in 2026.
Incident History - Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - The George Washington University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The George Washington University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Johns Hopkins Systems Engineering for Professionals
The George Washington University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.