Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA)Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA)
VS
UCLUCL
Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA)

Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA)

N/A

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

The STOA Panel is a scientific advisory body composed of 27 Members of the European Parliament. Together with its European Science-Media Hub, STOA is part of the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), the in-house research service of the European Parliament. F...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UCL

UCL

Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, London, Greater London, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/
784/1000Fair

UCL (University College London) is London's leading multidisciplinary university, ranked 9th in the QS World University Rankings. Established in 1826 UCL opened up education in England for the first time to students of any race, class or religion and was also the first...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:24,088
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA)

Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UCL

UCL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCL in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UCL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA)

Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UCL

UCL

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UCL1210311022

FAQ

Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) company and UCL company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) company and UCL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) company and UCL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) company and UCL company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) company and UCL company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) company and UCL company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) company and UCL company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) company and UCL company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) company and UCL company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) company and UCL company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) company and UCL company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) and UCL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) and UCL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) or UCL ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) or UCL ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) and UCL, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) and UCL, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA