Comparison Overview
EP+Co

EP+Co
110 E. Court St., Greenville, 29601, US
Last Update: 02/01/2026
EP+Co is an agency of talented makers and doers on a mission to build belief with brands we love. By communicating a brand’s unique Truth through compelling action, we turn skeptical consumers into sold-in brand believers. Thanks to an uncommon level of specialized in...

Publicis Groupe
133, avenue des Champs-Elysées, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 07/05/2026
Founded in 1926 by Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet, today Publicis Groupe is the largest communications group in the world and a leader in marketing, communication, and digital business transformation, led by Arthur Sadoun, the third CEO in its history. Publicis Groupe is p...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

EP+Co







Publicis Groupe






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for EP+Co in 2026.
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Publicis Groupe in 2026.
Incident History - EP+Co (X = Date, Y = Severity)
EP+Co cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Publicis Groupe (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Publicis Groupe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

EP+Co

Publicis Groupe
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.