Comparison Overview
Department for Environment and Water
Department for Environment and Water
81-95 Waymouth Street, Adelaide, 5000, AU
Last Update: 31/03/2026
Our purpose is to help South Australians conserve, sustain and prosper. It’s a big role, and we need passionate people to help us achieve it. We help our environment stay healthy. We manage water for the future, respond to climate change, connect people to nature and ...
GSA
1800 F St. NW, Washington, 20405, US
Last Update: 31/03/2026
General Services Administration (GSA) is an independent agency of the United States government established in 1949 to help manage and support the basic functioning of federal agencies. Our organization includes the Public Buildings Service (PBS), Federal Acquisition Ser...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Department for Environment and Water
GSA
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Department for Environment and Water in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GSA in 2026.
Incident History - Department for Environment and Water (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Department for Environment and Water cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - GSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Department for Environment and Water
GSA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.