Comparison Overview
Envase Technologies

Envase Technologies
211 E Ocean Blvd, Long Beach, California, 90802, US
Last Update: 07/02/2026
At Envase, our mission is to deliver a single, streamlined system that digitizes the lifecycle of a container across the intermodal ecosystem. We offer best-in-class solutions and build best-of-breed applications for the next generation of data-driven decisions. Envase ...

Yellow
501 Commerce St. Suite, 1120, Nashville, 37203, US
Last Update: 02/07/2026
Yellow, a Fortune 500 company headquartered in Nashville, TN is one of the largest super-regional less-than-truckload (LTL) companies in North America. Nearly 100 years ago, Yellow created the LTL industry, and now it comprises four successful regional LTL companies and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Envase Technologies







Yellow






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Envase Technologies in 2026.
Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Yellow in 2026.
Incident History - Envase Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Envase Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Yellow (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Yellow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Envase Technologies

Yellow
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.