Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Entre Pros avec BNP ParibasEntre Pros avec BNP Paribas
VS
DesjardinsDesjardins
Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas

Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas

Paris, FR

Last Update: 04/02/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Bienvenue sur Entre Pro avec BNP Paribas ! Que vous soyez entrepreneur, artisan, commerçant, ou que vous exerciez une profession libérale ou de santé, nous vous proposons des conseils et solutions bancaires adaptés à vos besoins. Nos chargés d'affaires sont à votre éc...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:59
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Desjardins

Desjardins

100, rue des Commandeurs, Lévis, G6V 7N5, CA

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
632/1000Poor

Desjardins Group is the largest cooperative financial group in North America and the fifth largest cooperative financial group in the world, with assets of $435.8 billion as at March 31, 2024. It was named one of Canada's Best Employers by Forbes magazine and by Mediaco...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:43,222
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas

Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Desjardins

Desjardins

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Desjardins has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Desjardins (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Desjardins cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas

Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Desjardins

Desjardins

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DESSK-DOL1770631353
🔒 Incident : Breach
DES1767941129
🔒 Incident : Breach
DES1767719603

FAQ

Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas company and Desjardins company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas company and Desjardins company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas company and Desjardins company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas company and Desjardins company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas company and Desjardins company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas and Desjardins, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas and Desjardins, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas or Desjardins ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas or Desjardins ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas and Desjardins, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Entre Pros avec BNP Paribas and Desjardins, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56078
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56077
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56076
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56075
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56074
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8