Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ENAPENAP
VS
FastHealth CorporationFastHealth Corporation
ENAP

ENAP

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://enap.ltd
771/1000Fair

A software consulting company with unique approach to development. We focus on solving complex business problems in light and efficient manner utilizing only top tech experts. No fluff, no hassle, no overhead.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
FastHealth Corporation

FastHealth Corporation

N/A

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
794/1000Fair

Fast Health Corporation Products Mobile Apps Web Content Tools Patient Ed Components Paperless Hiring Business Office Forms/Billpay Software Health Commerce Patient Scheduling Premium Health Services Disaster Response Wellness Program FHC Social Networking

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:22
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ENAP

ENAP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
FastHealth Corporation

FastHealth Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ENAP in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FastHealth Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ENAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ENAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - FastHealth Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FastHealth Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ENAP

ENAP

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ENA2114281022
FastHealth Corporation

FastHealth Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FAS014072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
FAS124222922
🔒 Incident : Breach
FAS203072825

FAQ

Between ENAP company and FastHealth Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ENAP company and FastHealth Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ENAP company and FastHealth Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ENAP company and FastHealth Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ENAP company and FastHealth Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ENAP company and FastHealth Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ENAP company and FastHealth Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ENAP company and FastHealth Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ENAP company and FastHealth Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ENAP company and FastHealth Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ENAP company and FastHealth Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ENAP and FastHealth Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ENAP and FastHealth Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ENAP or FastHealth Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ENAP or FastHealth Corporation ?
Between ENAP and FastHealth Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ENAP and FastHealth Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2