Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Enpara.com ŞirketimEnpara.com Şirketim
VS
IDBI BankIDBI Bank
Enpara.com Şirketim

Enpara.com Şirketim

İstanbul, None, İstanbul, İstanbul, TR, 34394

Last Update: 26/04/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Türkiye'nin ilk şubesiz dijital bankası olarak 2012 yılından beri bireysel müşterilerimize verdiğimiz şubesiz, masrafsız ve kolay bankacılık hizmetini artık şirketler için de sunuyoruz! Enpara.com'da şubemiz olmadığı için şube kirası, elektrik, su, doğalgaz, kırtasiye v...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IDBI Bank

IDBI Bank

IDBI Tower, WTC Complex,, Mumbai, 400005, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.idbibank.in/
776/1000Fair

Welcome to IDBI Bank's LinkedIn page! We are a leading bank in India, with a rich legacy. At IDBI Bank, we believe in empowering our customers by providing them with a wide range of banking products and services to meet their financial needs. Whether you are an indivi...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:17,904
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Enpara.com Şirketim

Enpara.com Şirketim

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IDBI Bank

IDBI Bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enpara.com Şirketim in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IDBI Bank in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Enpara.com Şirketim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enpara.com Şirketim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IDBI Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IDBI Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Enpara.com Şirketim

Enpara.com Şirketim

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IDBI Bank

IDBI Bank

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Enpara.com Şirketim company and IDBI Bank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim company and IDBI Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim company and IDBI Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim company and IDBI Bank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim company and IDBI Bank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim company and IDBI Bank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim company and IDBI Bank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim company and IDBI Bank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim company and IDBI Bank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim company and IDBI Bank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim company and IDBI Bank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim and IDBI Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim and IDBI Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Enpara.com Şirketim or IDBI Bank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Enpara.com Şirketim or IDBI Bank ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim and IDBI Bank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Enpara.com Şirketim and IDBI Bank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2