Comparison Overview
Ennolys by Lesaffre
Ennolys by Lesaffre
ZA, Soustons, 40140, FR
Last Update: 05/12/2025
Ennolys met les avancées de la biotechnologie au service de nombreuses industries telles que l’alimentaire, le nutraceutique, la cosmétique, l’aromatique et l’agriculture. En tant que business unit de Lesaffre, nous conjuguons deux activités autour de l’expertise en fer...
Louis Dreyfus Company
Westblaak 92, Rotterdam, South Holland, NL, 3012 KM
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Louis Dreyfus Company is a leading merchant and processor of agricultural goods. We leverage our global reach and extensive asset network to serve our customers and consumers around the world, delivering the right products to the right location, at the right time – safe...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Ennolys by Lesaffre
Louis Dreyfus Company
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ennolys by Lesaffre in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Louis Dreyfus Company has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Ennolys by Lesaffre (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ennolys by Lesaffre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Louis Dreyfus Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Louis Dreyfus Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Ennolys by Lesaffre
Louis Dreyfus Company
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.