Comparison Overview

ENGlobal

VS

TechnipFMC

ENGlobal

11740 Katy Fwy, Houston, Texas, 77079, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 550 and 599

Who We Are ENG Founded in 1985, ENGlobal (NASDAQ: ENG) is a specialty engineering services firm that focuses on automation solutions and select EPCM projects for the energy industry and markets throughout the world. Our Automation segment specializes in integrated services related to the design, fabrication and implementation of advanced automation, control, instrumentation and process analytical systems. The EPCM segment provides consulting services for the development, management and execution of projects requiring professional engineering, construction management, and related support services. Markets Served: • Upstream • Midstream • Downstream • Pulp and Paper • Alternative Energy • Government Core Values: • HSE (Health, Safety and Environment) commitment • Integrity and Accountability always • Teamwork in all we do • Quality throughout • Communication from the start Vision: Our vision is to become the preferred provider of innovative automation integration services and select EPCM projects to clients across the globe. Mission Statement: Our mission is to safely deliver solutions that ensure success for all stakeholders, while demonstrating good stewardship of the world around us.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 1,145
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

TechnipFMC

Hadrian House, Wincomblee Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, undefined, NE6 3PL, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

TechnipFMC is a leading technology provider to the traditional and new energies industry, delivering fully integrated projects, products, and services. With our proprietary technologies and comprehensive solutions, we are transforming our clients’ project economics, helping them unlock new possibilities to develop energy resources while reducing carbon intensity and supporting their energy transition ambitions. Organized in two business segments — Subsea and Surface Technologies — we will continue to advance the industry with our pioneering integrated ecosystems (such as iEPCI™, iFEED™ and iComplete™), technology leadership and digital innovation. Each of our approximately 20,000 employees is driven by a commitment to our clients’ success, and a culture of strong execution, purposeful innovation, and challenging industry conventions. To learn more about us and how we are enhancing the performance of the world’s energy industry, go to TechnipFMC.com.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 38,331
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/englobal.jpeg
ENGlobal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technipfmc.jpeg
TechnipFMC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ENGlobal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TechnipFMC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ENGlobal in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TechnipFMC in 2025.

Incident History — ENGlobal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ENGlobal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TechnipFMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TechnipFMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/englobal.jpeg
ENGlobal
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unauthorized IT system access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technipfmc.jpeg
TechnipFMC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TechnipFMC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ENGlobal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ENGlobal company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TechnipFMC company has not reported any.

In the current year, TechnipFMC company and ENGlobal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

ENGlobal company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while TechnipFMC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither TechnipFMC company nor ENGlobal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TechnipFMC company nor ENGlobal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ENGlobal company nor TechnipFMC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ENGlobal nor TechnipFMC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TechnipFMC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ENGlobal company.

TechnipFMC company employs more people globally than ENGlobal company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither ENGlobal nor TechnipFMC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ENGlobal nor TechnipFMC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ENGlobal nor TechnipFMC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ENGlobal nor TechnipFMC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ENGlobal nor TechnipFMC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ENGlobal nor TechnipFMC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X