Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EnglobalEnglobal
VS
ShellShell
Englobal

Englobal

11740 Katy Fwy, Houston, 77079, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.englobal.com
677/1000Weak

Who We Are Englobal Founded in 1985, ENGlobal (NASDAQ: ENG) is a specialty engineering services firm that focuses on automation solutions and select EPCM projects for the energy industry and markets throughout the world. Our Automation segment specializes in integrated...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:1,125
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Shell

Shell

York Road, London, SE1 7NA, GB

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.shell.com
744/1000Moderate

Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, employing 96,000 people across 70+ countries. We serve around 1 million commercial and industrial customers, and around 33 million customers daily at our Shell-branded retail service stations. Our purpose i...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:213,214
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Englobal

Englobal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Shell

Shell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Englobal in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

Shell has 296.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Englobal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Englobal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Shell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Englobal

Englobal

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ENG000012925
Shell

Shell

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MCDCITSHEVODVERATTGITCURAUSVMW1787509645
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PHISHE1786703569
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PTC1774441546

FAQ

Between Englobal company and Shell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Englobal company and Shell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Englobal company and Shell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Englobal company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Englobal company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Englobal company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Englobal company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Englobal company and Shell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Englobal company and Shell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Englobal company and Shell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Englobal company and Shell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Englobal and Shell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Englobal and Shell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Englobal or Shell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Englobal or Shell ?
Between Englobal and Shell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Englobal and Shell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2