Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Engel & Völkers Southern AfricaEngel & Völkers Southern Africa
VS
CoStar GroupCoStar Group
Engel & Völkers Southern Africa

Engel & Völkers Southern Africa

Cedar Avenue, Fourways, Johannesburg, 2055, South Africa, Gauteng, 2055, ZA

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile

Engel & Völkers aims to help you turn your real estate dreams into a reality. We know that property dealings are far more than mere business transactions. After all, our homes are where we choose to live and where precious memories are made for a lifetime. That is why n...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:64
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CoStar Group

CoStar Group

1201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, Virginia, US, 22209

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.costargroup.com
793/1000Fair

CoStar Group (NASDAQ: CSGP) is a global leader in commercial real estate information, analytics, online marketplaces, and 3D digital twin technology. Founded in 1986, CoStar Group is dedicated to digitizing the world’s real estate, empowering all people to discover prop...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,942
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Engel & Völkers Southern Africa

Engel & Völkers Southern Africa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CoStar Group

CoStar Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Engel & Völkers Southern Africa in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CoStar Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Engel & Völkers Southern Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Engel & Völkers Southern Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CoStar Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CoStar Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Engel & Völkers Southern Africa

Engel & Völkers Southern Africa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CoStar Group

CoStar Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa company and CoStar Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa company and CoStar Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa company and CoStar Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa company and CoStar Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa company and CoStar Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa and CoStar Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa and CoStar Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Engel & Völkers Southern Africa or CoStar Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Engel & Völkers Southern Africa or CoStar Group ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa and CoStar Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Engel & Völkers Southern Africa and CoStar Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2