Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Enflex, a Coesia brandEnflex, a Coesia brand
VS
TakedaTakeda
Enflex, a Coesia brand

Enflex, a Coesia brand

Pol. Ind. Can Vinyalets, C/ Can Vinyalets, 4, Santa Perpètua de Mogoda, , 08130, ES

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.enflex.es/en
753/1000Fair

Enflex, a Coesia brand, designs and manufactures HFFS (Horizontal Form Fill and Seal) flexible packaging machines tailored for the Pharma & Healthcare Industry. Enflex designs and produces a wide range of flat pouches machines to package pharmaceutical and nutraceutica...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Takeda

Takeda

Tokyo, JP

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.takeda.com/
815/1000Good

We strive to transform lives. While the science we advance is constantly evolving, our core purpose is enduring. For more than two centuries, our values have guided us to do what’s right for patients and for society. We know that changing lives requires us to do things...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:37,228
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Enflex, a Coesia brand

Enflex, a Coesia brand

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Takeda

Takeda

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enflex, a Coesia brand in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Takeda in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Enflex, a Coesia brand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enflex, a Coesia brand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Takeda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Takeda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Enflex, a Coesia brand

Enflex, a Coesia brand

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Takeda

Takeda

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Enflex, a Coesia brand company and Takeda company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand company and Takeda company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand company and Takeda company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand company and Takeda company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand company and Takeda company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand company and Takeda company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand company and Takeda company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand company and Takeda company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand company and Takeda company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand company and Takeda company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand company and Takeda company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand and Takeda, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand and Takeda, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Enflex, a Coesia brand or Takeda ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Enflex, a Coesia brand or Takeda ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand and Takeda, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Enflex, a Coesia brand and Takeda, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2