Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

S&P Global EnergyS&P Global Energy
VS
PetrobrasPetrobras
S&P Global Energy

S&P Global Energy

55 Water Street, New York, NY 10014, US

Last Update: 28/04/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

We provide the market insights so you can make informed trading and business decisions. We’re the leading independent provider of information and benchmark prices for commodities and energy markets.

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Petrobras

Petrobras

Avenida República do Chile, n. 65, Centro, Rio de Janeiro, 20031-912, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.petrobras.com.br
773/1000Fair

Nosso propósito é prover energia que assegure prosperidade de forma ética, justa, segura e competitiva. Queremos ser a melhor empresa diversificada e integrada de energia na geração de valor, construindo um mundo mais sustentável, conciliando o foco em óleo e gás com a ...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:54,919
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
S&P Global Energy

S&P Global Energy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Petrobras

Petrobras

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for S&P Global Energy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Petrobras in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - S&P Global Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

S&P Global Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Petrobras (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Petrobras cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
S&P Global Energy

S&P Global Energy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Petrobras

Petrobras

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PET1592215112025

FAQ

Between S&P Global Energy company and Petrobras company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between S&P Global Energy company and Petrobras company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between S&P Global Energy company and Petrobras company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between S&P Global Energy company and Petrobras company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between S&P Global Energy company and Petrobras company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between S&P Global Energy company and Petrobras company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between S&P Global Energy company and Petrobras company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between S&P Global Energy company and Petrobras company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between S&P Global Energy company and Petrobras company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between S&P Global Energy company and Petrobras company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between S&P Global Energy company and Petrobras company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between S&P Global Energy and Petrobras, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between S&P Global Energy and Petrobras, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - S&P Global Energy or Petrobras ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - S&P Global Energy or Petrobras ?
Between S&P Global Energy and Petrobras, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between S&P Global Energy and Petrobras, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA