Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Energolux (Equans)Energolux (Equans)
VS
ANDRITZANDRITZ
Energolux (Equans)

Energolux (Equans)

7, rue de Bitbourg, Luxembourg, L-1273, LU

Last Update: 05/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.energolux.lu
744/1000Moderate

Energolux, founded in 1982, is headquartered in Luxembourg-Hamm and employs over 60 highly qualified technicians and engineers. Energolux offers solutions that respect and protect the environment through efficient cogeneration modules, in addition to energy distribution...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:99
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ANDRITZ

ANDRITZ

Stattegger Strasse 18, Graz, 8045, AT

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.andritz.com
767/1000Fair

ANDRITZ is an international technology group based in Austria. The company offers a broad portfolio of innovative plants, equipment, systems, services and digital solutions for a wide range of industries and end markets. Sustainability is an integral part of the compa...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:14,553
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Energolux (Equans)

Energolux (Equans)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ANDRITZ

ANDRITZ

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Energolux (Equans) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ANDRITZ in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Energolux (Equans) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Energolux (Equans) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ANDRITZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ANDRITZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Energolux (Equans)

Energolux (Equans)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ANDRITZ

ANDRITZ

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Energolux (Equans) company and ANDRITZ company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Energolux (Equans) company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Energolux (Equans) company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Energolux (Equans) company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Energolux (Equans) company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Energolux (Equans) company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Energolux (Equans) company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Energolux (Equans) company and ANDRITZ company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Energolux (Equans) company and ANDRITZ company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Energolux (Equans) company and ANDRITZ company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Energolux (Equans) company and ANDRITZ company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Energolux (Equans) and ANDRITZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Energolux (Equans) and ANDRITZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Energolux (Equans) or ANDRITZ ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Energolux (Equans) or ANDRITZ ?
Between Energolux (Equans) and ANDRITZ, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Energolux (Equans) and ANDRITZ, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3