Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Enel BrasilEnel Brasil
VS
Southern California Edison (SCE)Southern California Edison (SCE)
Enel Brasil

Enel Brasil

Avenida das Nações Unidas, 14401, Vila Gertrudes, São Paulo, SP , 04794000, BR

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.enel.com.br/
772/1000Fair

Open Power for a brighter future: nós construímos um amanhã melhor. A Enel Brasil faz parte da Enel Group, uma empresa multinacional que está mudando a cara da energia e é um dos principais operadores integrados do setor elétrico no mundo. Nosso compromisso contínuo...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:4,069
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Southern California Edison (SCE)

Southern California Edison (SCE)

2244 Walnut Grove Ave., Rosemead, 91770, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sce.com/
754/1000Fair

As one of the nation’s largest electric utilities, we’re bringing more clean and renewable sources of energy to Southern California. From energy storage to transportation electrification, our employees are working on innovative projects that will help cut emissions an...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:12,464
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Enel Brasil

Enel Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Southern California Edison (SCE)

Southern California Edison (SCE)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enel Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern California Edison (SCE) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Enel Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enel Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Southern California Edison (SCE) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern California Edison (SCE) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Enel Brasil

Enel Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Southern California Edison (SCE)

Southern California Edison (SCE)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SCE310072925

FAQ

Between Enel Brasil company and Southern California Edison (SCE) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Enel Brasil company and Southern California Edison (SCE) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Enel Brasil company and Southern California Edison (SCE) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Enel Brasil company and Southern California Edison (SCE) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Enel Brasil company and Southern California Edison (SCE) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Enel Brasil company and Southern California Edison (SCE) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Enel Brasil company and Southern California Edison (SCE) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Enel Brasil company and Southern California Edison (SCE) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Enel Brasil company and Southern California Edison (SCE) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Enel Brasil company and Southern California Edison (SCE) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Enel Brasil company and Southern California Edison (SCE) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Enel Brasil and Southern California Edison (SCE), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Enel Brasil and Southern California Edison (SCE), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Enel Brasil or Southern California Edison (SCE) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Enel Brasil or Southern California Edison (SCE) ?
Between Enel Brasil and Southern California Edison (SCE), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Enel Brasil and Southern California Edison (SCE), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9