Comparison Overview
Endesa

Endesa
Calle de la Ribera del Loira, 60, Madrid, 28042, ES
Last Update: 02/05/2026
We are leaders in the Spanish electric power industry and the second operator in the Portuguese electric market. With more than 10 thousand employees, we provide our services to 12.6 million clients and our core business is the production, transportation, distribution a...

Xunta de Galicia
San Caetano, s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15781, ES
Last Update: 01/04/2026
A Xunta aparece definida no Estatuto de Autonomía, aprobado en 1981, como órgano colexiado do Goberno de Galicia. Na actualidade, a Xunta está composta polo presidente e dez conselleiros. A comunidade exerce as súas funcións administrativas a través da Xunta e dos seus ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Endesa







Xunta de Galicia






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
Endesa has 12.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Xunta de Galicia in 2026.
Incident History - Endesa (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Endesa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Xunta de Galicia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Xunta de Galicia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Endesa

Xunta de Galicia
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.