Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Encore Boston HarborEncore Boston Harbor
VS
Best Western Hotels & ResortsBest Western Hotels & Resorts
Encore Boston Harbor

Encore Boston Harbor

One Broadway, Everett, MA, 02149, US

Last Update: 27/01/2026

View Profile
777/1000Fair

Encore Boston Harbor features 210,000 square-feet of gaming space including more than 2,700 slot machines and 185 table games. Situated on the Mystic River in Everett, MA and connected to Boston Harbor, Encore Boston Harbor also boasts 671 spacious hotel rooms, a spa, s...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:906
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Best Western Hotels & Resorts

Best Western Hotels & Resorts

6201 N 24th Parkway, Phoenix, 85016, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bestwestern.com
797/1000Fair

Best Western Hotels & Resorts headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, is a privately held hotel company within the BWH℠ Hotels global enterprise. With 19 brands and approximately 4,300 hotels in over 100 countries and territories worldwide*, BWH Hotels suits the needs of dev...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:17,637
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Encore Boston Harbor

Encore Boston Harbor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Best Western Hotels & Resorts

Best Western Hotels & Resorts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Encore Boston Harbor in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Best Western Hotels & Resorts in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Encore Boston Harbor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Encore Boston Harbor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Best Western Hotels & Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Best Western Hotels & Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Encore Boston Harbor

Encore Boston Harbor

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Best Western Hotels & Resorts

Best Western Hotels & Resorts

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Encore Boston Harbor company and Best Western Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor company and Best Western Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor company and Best Western Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor company and Best Western Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor company and Best Western Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor company and Best Western Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor company and Best Western Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor company and Best Western Hotels & Resorts company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor company and Best Western Hotels & Resorts company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor company and Best Western Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor company and Best Western Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor and Best Western Hotels & Resorts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor and Best Western Hotels & Resorts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Encore Boston Harbor or Best Western Hotels & Resorts ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Encore Boston Harbor or Best Western Hotels & Resorts ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor and Best Western Hotels & Resorts, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Encore Boston Harbor and Best Western Hotels & Resorts, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1