Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc.Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc.
VS
TechnipFMCTechnipFMC
Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc.

Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc.

N/A

Last Update: 14/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.naturalgasnb.com
742/1000Moderate

Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, the natural gas distributor for New Brunswick, is a regulated utility that distributes natural gas to institutional, commercial, industrial, and residential customers in nine communities in southern New Brunswick.

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TechnipFMC

TechnipFMC

Hadrian House, Wincomblee Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE6 3PL, GB

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://technipfmc.com
793/1000Fair

TechnipFMC is a leading technology provider to the traditional and new energies industry, delivering fully integrated projects, products, and services. With our proprietary technologies and comprehensive solutions, we are transforming our clients’ project economics, h...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:38,099
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc.

Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TechnipFMC

TechnipFMC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TechnipFMC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TechnipFMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TechnipFMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc.

Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TechnipFMC

TechnipFMC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. company and TechnipFMC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. company and TechnipFMC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. company and TechnipFMC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. company and TechnipFMC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. company and TechnipFMC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. and TechnipFMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. and TechnipFMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. or TechnipFMC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. or TechnipFMC ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. and TechnipFMC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Inc. and TechnipFMC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2